False advertising
Editor,
"Save your first patient. Choose an alternative to the animal lab." So was I admonished by a "Babe"-like piglet in the advertisement placed by The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine in the March 1 issue of The Post.
As a second-year osteopathic medical student at OU-COM, I was among the participants in the Fall Quarter cardiovascular laboratory involving live animal subjects. Contrary to the ad's premise, no computer model, interactive video, or simulator would have provided an equivalent educational experience to the one in which I took part.
None of these modalities would have afforded future physicians the opportunity to actually feel the contractions of a beating heart, clamp a vessel with blood coursing through its walls or stimulate a viable and functioning nerve. If prestigious institutions such as Yale, Harvard and Stanford have abandoned live animal laboratories in favor of so-called alternatives, that is their unfortunate loss.
Though I am opposed to the purposeless or haphazard sacrifice of animal lives, the anesthetized pigs in question constituted an essential part of a worthwhile educational endeavor. Consider for a moment the possibility that knowledge acquired in the exercises might somehow contribute to saving a life - a human life - at some time in the future. Only then may one reach a logical conclusion about what responsible medicine really is.
Benjamin P. Almasanu
13C Station St.