Friday, April 30, 1999


THE POST


Athens, Ohio * An Independent Daily Newspaper * Ohio University
Diverse opinions

THE POST

Editor,

Although I did not attend the "Your God or Mine?" conference, I feel I must reply to a statement of religious intolerance that appeared in the story. According to Matt Jordan "either all religions are false or only one is true." I entirely disagree.

Religion is only the map, and there are many ways to the top of a mountain. The truth that I live might not be your truth but this does not mean that one of us is deluded and condemned.

If one reads gospels that were edited from the King James Bible, like the gospel of Thomas, the message is not one of following but rather that each individual should seek to become a Christ in his or her own right. Speaking as if Christianity is a cohesive and unified body of teachings is to totally disrespect history and live in a fantasy world.

This sort of orthodox either/or dichotomy is a construct that permits extreme intolerance and persecution that we see in much of the world. I would ask that we try to be a more respectful of the fact that those who do not experience the world in the same way are not inherently deluded. Rainbows, not a black and white world.

Daniel Foor
df188895

Ultimate test of freedoms

How far are Americans willing to go to exercise and defend their First Amendment rights?

For our senators and congressional representatives, the decision will come down to allowing the burning of the flag - a national symbol for freedom of expression and First Amendment rights.

The House and Senate are expected to vote this week on a constitutional amendment to allow a law prohibiting desecration of the American flag. The vote is predicted to be the closest on the emotionally charged topic since 1989, when the U.S. Supreme Court declared flag burning a constitutionally protected form of speech.

Our lawmakers must look beyond the cries of patriotism and tradition and vote against an amendment to ban flag burning.

Those who speak against flag burning claim it shows disrespect for a symbol of our past and our government, a slap in the face of the democracy we have defended for years.

But those who speak against flag burning should remember that without the First Amendment, the flag would mean nothing. And the First Amendment includes allowing speech and expression with which you vehemently disagree.

If lawmakers pass the amendment, they set a dangerous precedent for limiting free speech. Some could interpret the amendment liberally and attempt to ban protests involving the flag, burning of other universal symbols of democracy or speech.

Above all other citizens, our elected lawmakers, whose job is made possible by democracy and free speech, must be prepared to defend the First Amendment and strike down an amendment to ban a form of free speech.

Anything less would be unpatriotic.


[Front Page] [Top Story] [Today's Edition] [The Post Archives] [About The Post] [Post Phone Numbers] [Staff Resumes] [Advertising Information] [Contact Us] [Useful Links] [Entertainment]