Wednesday, September 8, 1999


THE POST


Athens, Ohio * An Independent Daily Newspaper * Ohio University
Social status not relevant
THE POST

Standardized test scores like the SAT speak for themselves. Results are kept separate from a college-bound student's personal background information.

But the Educational Testing Service, the company that creates the SAT, is researching a new method of profiling students that would jeopardize the system by including personal information with test results.

In the proposed system, testing officials will label selected students as "strivers" if they determine the students have overcome adverse social backgrounds to achieve high test scores.

ETS officials should stop dead in their tracks and discontinue research for the flawed initiative. Colleges should reward students who overcome unfavorable social backgrounds, but the SAT is an inappropriate medium.

Standardized tests are a broad-based, universal way to determine what a student knows. The results provide college admissions officers with a straightforward way to evaluate a student's academic abilities.

To determine a "striver," ETS would consider about 14 factors that might have affected a student's educational background. Factors include parents' education level, family income and whether a student speaks English as a second language.

Students who score 200 points higher than average - despite challenging social backgrounds - would be labeled "strivers."

Standardized tests do not measure work ethic. Students who score high on a standardized test still could have poor study habits. A high score does not guarantee a hard-working student.

Including personal information and labeling students as "strivers" slants the level playing field on which all students compete.

Bush's plan flunks out
THE POST

Republican presidential contender George W. Bush announced his education platform for the 2000 presidential campaign last week. But America still is waiting for him to offer an effective solution for the nation's deteriorating public school system.

Bush plans to strip federal funding from failing public schools "that cheat poor children." The money, instead, would allow parents to pay for tutors or transfer their children to better schools, including private and parochial schools.

Alerting schools with students who score below-par on annual state educational tests is a sound idea, but Bush's plan to recoup funding would send the public school system to its own funeral.

Bush says the threat of losing funds will create positive competition among schools to improve conditions. But if the competition fails, parents could send students to private schools with federal money - about $1,500 per student.

Taking money and students away from public schools only sidesteps the problem.

Fewer students will reduce teacher salaries or worse - lead to fewer teachers. Who wants to teach in a school without pupils because the government gives parents money to send students elsewhere?

Another possible calamity might be a school that slides its grading scale downward to prevent students from failing state standards, even if the students are unqualified to continue to the next grade.

Bush's plan also fails to give economically challenged parents enough money to send their children to private schools - $1,500 hardly is enough to pay for private education unless parents pay thousands of additional dollars.

Bush is the front-runner for the Republican party presidential nomination. But he should rethink his education platform to hit below the surface and solve the nation's public school problems.


[Front Page] [Top Story] [Today's Edition] [The Post Archives] [About The Post] [Post Phone Numbers] [Staff Resumes] [Advertising Information] [Contact Us] [Useful Links] [Entertainment]