OU makes lousy parent THE POST
The 1960s was not only a time of free love, but also the beginning of freedom for Ohio University students.
Before the '60s, OU played a large role in students' daily lives. This idea is defined as the term in loco parentis - college serving as stand-in parents for students. Students had strict curfews and restricted visitation privileges.
But through the years, this type of supervision faded along with the tie-dye - until now.
A clear example of the university's increasingly watchful eye is pilot one-year parental notification policy. This policy notifies the parents of freshmen and tells them of their child's judiciary records.
Students, OU is watching you.
Playing "Mom and Dad" is not OU's responsibility and students do not need the university holding their hands as they jay-walk into our futures.
College is a transition period when students begin lives of their own. Guidance, counseling and other services need to be available, but not mandatory. Students must be able to make decisions independently, otherwise they will not mature.
A public university still is responsible for student's safety and people who commit crimes need to be punished. But this does not mean the university should go back curfews and visitation limitations.
The university offers a facility where students can learn and live. Students need to be equipped with the finest education and have someone to go to when problems arise.
People attend college because they choose to. And they need the chance to be independent and responsible. Universities should not assume students need strict rules - that implies they will fail.
The university has a job to do - giving its students the best education and keeping them safe.
Sending letters home and tattling oversteps the bounds of the university. OU is an educating institution, not a babysitter.
Sex classes need reality THE POST
The government says abstinence is the best policy and it's ready to fund programs teaching youth to keep their zippers up and pants buttoned.
Scripps Howard News Service reported Monday that Congress is prepared to double federal spending on educational programs advocating sexual abstinence until marriage.
This program, promoting only sexual-abstinence, would be geared to unmarried adults and teens and receive an additional $50 million per year.
This money would be better spent on improving sexual education. Teens and unmarried adults do not know enough about contraception and they are not going to learn if programs only teach abstinence.
People are going to have sex. And they will not know how to protect themselves against sexually transmitted infections if those topics are left out of the curriculum.
The program also want to emphasize sex is "a mutually faithful monogamous relationship in the context of marriage is the expected standard of human sexual activity."
Much of society views sex as a taboo. And scaring young adults will not to fight teen pregnancy and other sexual issues. Young adults must be taught that sex is something they need to be ready for emotionally, as well as physically.
Education will reach out to young adults, but the it must include abstinence and contraception.
|