Controversy surrounds death-row case
by Toby Fallsgraff
For The Post
At about 11:00 p.m. on April 17, 1983, a red van sped
away from a Cincinnati-area King Kwik. Inside the store, Monte Tewksbury,
the lone night clerk, was fatally stabbed during a robbery. The three
men in the van, who had been drinking beer and taking drugs throughout
the day, took $133.97, Tewksbury's watch, his wedding ring and his wallet.
Meanwhile, the clerk struggled to an outside telephone and called
his wife, told her of the robbery and that he had been injured. Before
authorities arrived at the scene, Tewksbury told Cecil Conley, a customer
who arrived after the stabbing, that he was having trouble. Within a few
minutes, the police and Mrs. Tewksbury arrived at the scene. Shortly after
being transported to Providence hospital, Tewksbury died from internal
bleeding.
Almost 18 years later, John W. Byrd, Jr. waits on death row, convicted
of aggravated murder and aggravated robbery. Byrd is one of two men who
are next in line on Ohio's Death Row, said Todd Boyer, communications
director of the Ohio Attorney General's office. With his appeals exhausted,
the odds are likely that the Ohio Supreme Court will set his execution
date for early summer.
But in what has been described as a "long-shot, 11th-hour effort" to
save his client's life, Public Defender David Bodiker asked the Ohio Supreme
Court on Jan. 26 to stay Byrd's execution so the defendant could file
a rare claim of "actual innocence" in Hamilton County Common Pleas Court.
The claim revolves around an affidavit signed by Byrd's accomplice,
John E. Brewer, in which Brewer confesses to having stabbed Tewksbury.
The affidavit quotes Brewer as he hopped into the van saying to driver
William Woodall, "Man, I just stabbed a guy, take off." Because the affidavit
indicates Byrd was not the "principal offender," Bodiker said he should
not be put to death.
The affidavit, originally signed in 1989, had been at the disposal
of the Public Defender's office for 12 years. Until this filing, it had
not been used - not even in 1994, when Byrd was just one hour away from
execution because of Judge Carl Rubin's refusal to issue a stay. The Sixth
Circuit Court of Appeals stepped in and stayed his execution to allow
his appeals to move forward, removing Rubin from the case, according to
the ruling.
This 12-year delay has raised serious questions in Ohio Attorney
General Betty Montgomery's office. Montgomery issued a response to the
claim, saying, "(The public defender's motion) is either another outrageous
attempt to game the system or it represents a complete failure on the
part of the public defender to serve their client."
Bodiker, who was not the original public defender assigned to the
case, acknowledges that, in retrospect, it might not have been wiser to
present the affidavit, but he said, "Hamilton County does not consider
'actual innocence' to be a relevant claim in post-conviction procedure."
Hamilton County Prosecutor Michael K. Allen called the motion "outrageous"
in a Jan. 28 Columbus Dispatch article. Allen announced he plans to file
a complaint against the public defender with the Disciplinary Counsel
of the Ohio Supreme Court.
"The sun is setting, the execution is starting, and they mysteriously
find this individual who comes forward and says he did it ... (Brewer's)
lies have no weight whatsoever. They're garbage," he said in the article.
Byrd initially was charged with two death penalty specifications
because of testimony from Ronald Armstead, a fellow inmate of Byrd's.
In the 1983 testimony, Armstead, who was not involved in the robbery,
identified Byrd as Tewksbury's murderer. It was not long after his testimony
in Byrd's case that Armstead came before the Ohio Parole Board and was
released.
Simultaneously, Armstead came forward in the case of Billy Joe Sewell,
claiming Sewell had confessed to his crime as well. Armstead never testified
in this trial.
Assistant Hamilton County Prosecutor Daniel J. Breyer, who had handled
Byrd's case, wrote an unofficial recommendation to the parole board in
which he commended Armstead's cooperation, saying that without Armstead's
help, Byrd's case "would have concluded with a much less favorable result."
Prior to the testimony, however, previous recommendations had been "stinging,"
to the effect of "never let this guy out," Bodiker said.
"We have a half-dozen people saying Byrd never talked to (Armstead),"
he said.
C. Ronald Huff, dean of social ecology at the University of California-Irvine
and an expert on errors in felony trials, said these so-called "jailhouse
snitches" are "notoriously unreliable" because of the incentives they
stand to receive from helping the often politically motivated prosecutor
get a conviction.
Vince Popp, a defense attorney who has worked in capital cases, said
he has witnessed such questionable conduct.
"I think there are cases where prosecutors want to appear tough on crime,"
Popp said. "And if they seek the death penalty, they want to make sure
they get it."
And if Brewer's affidavit, which was reconfirmed in January, proves
to be true, it could stand in the way of Brewer's possible parole in 2015.
But two recent affidavits from the assistant prosecutor's office state
that Woodall, Byrd's other accomplice, has taken back former statements
in which he implicated Brewer. According to the affidavits, Woodall said
he lied to protect his friend at the request of Brewer. In Woodall's original
affidavit in 1989, he implicated Brewer, stating that during the getaway,
Brewer remarked, "The guy gave me some trouble, so I had to stick him."
Bodiker said the validity of these new affidavits is questionable.
Woodall, who is dying from lung cancer and is on a morphine pump and respirator
at the Ohio State University Hospital Intensive Care Unit, would have
been unable to make such statements, he said. Describing Woodall as "totally
incoherent," Bodiker said that the warden has said that he is in no condition
to talk to anybody.
But Allen said the Prosecutor's office denies these assertions and
stands behind the affidavits.
|