World War II movie creates battle to stay alert, awake
by Todd Johnson
For The Post
Hart’s War is
so dull. This reviewer watched the movie wishing that Black
Hawk Down were playing on the
screen, or remembering the classic World War II prisoner-of-war film
Stalag 17. Any four
episodes of that classic’s television spin-off, Hogan’s
Heroes, would be far more entertaining than Hart’s
War, and probably more believable.
Bruce Willis stars and gets to mug self-importantly in this preachy
movie after spending so much of his career doing popcorn action flicks.
Unfortunately, even Hudson Hawk contains
more profundity.
Maybe not, but the issues raised in Hart’s War
are not surprising. Apparently, many American soldiers during World
War II were racists. Considering that the civil rights movement in
this country did not begin until long after the war, this is not exactly
startling. What’s next, a film that exposes the racism that existed
during the Civil War?
The story centers on Lt. Tommy Hart (Colin Farrell), a winy and
wimpy soldier from a privileged family who ends up in a German POW
camp run by a sympathetic Nazi (that’s not a joke,) Col. Visser (Marcel
Iures). Col. McNamara (Willis), the leader of the American hostages,
is a racist and seems to be more of a bad guy than Visser. By far
the most interesting point the film makes is that German POWs in the
American South were treated better than black Americans. Now that
you’ve read that, you do not need to waste your time with this movie.
A plot finally begins when two black Tuskegee airmen are captured
and brought to the camp. Even though they are lieutenants, the enlisted
men do not want to share quarters with them. One gets shot after an
apparent escape attempt, and the other is accused of murdering a sergeant
(Cole Hauser) who makes his racist views evident throughout the film.
The story becomes silly when Hart, a Yale law student, convinces
Visser that the accused Lt. Scott (Terrance Howard) deserves a fair
military trial. Visser, a Yale law graduate, goes along, provides
assistance, and allows Hart to question his authority as Hart exposes
corruption among Visser’s men in their bartering with prisoners. Apparently,
Visser does not have a war to think about or Nazi superiors watching
his back.
Added to the unrealistic trial is a ridiculously unbelievable climax.
On top of this, and despite a camp full of prisoners and guards, only
five characters have any personality, and the one who provides the
most tension is murdered. Even Willis’ Armageddon has
more character development.