City falls with park plan
City of Athens officials took fiscal mismanagement to the extreme when
it approved the next step toward a skate park that could cost the already
strapped city $250,000. In the face of a stanch budget that forced officials
to close a fire station to avoid overtime costs, city council members
unanimously approved to pay up to $15,000 for the design of a skate park.
The city’s budget already is woefully inadequate. The prospect of allocating
$15,000 to hire Portland, Ore.-based design company Grindline is irresponsible.
The proposed park will be built next to the current and barren one at
701 E. State St. Few skaters use the current park because it is too small
and cannot accommodate patrons.
Even with the proposed park, skaters will continue
to vandalize Athens streets. Part of the draw to the extreme sport is
experimenting on different terrains. If skaters become bored with the
proposed facility, they will return to the streets, leaving paraffin wax
and shards of paint in their wake. Although skating is illegal Uptown
and on Ohio University rails, officials routinely turn the other way and
allow facilities to be destroyed under the boards’ weight. It is absurd
that officials are forced to accept this behavior because skaters have
no alternative.
The key to bringing about a skating facility
rests on the ability of the city to form partnerships to bring funding
to the table. While OU has pledged $50,000 to the effort, city leaders
must solicit other funds from stakeholders whose property could be destroyed.
At Monday’s council meeting, members said a potential exists for donated
labor and materials from concrete companies and excavating firms. The
notion of a skate park is positive, but if skaters want a skate park,
then skaters should be leading this cause — and the fundraising — not
a council already strapped for cash. Private funding is key if this project
is going to move forward.
In a city where fire stations have to be closed
to save money, it is reckless for city officials to spend money on a skate
park that will benefit a handful, increase the burden on the city and
stretch an already shaky budget beyond its limits. Until city officials
develop a way to cope with the budget they should review their spending
habits carefully and act in the best interest of the city.
J-School profs must move on
In a journalism
school that preaches the sanctity of the First Amendment, a he-said/she-said
barrage of free speech has embroiled two professors for five years and
has dragged on too long. Now that a special counsel's report has confirmed
six incidents of non-collegial and nonprofessional conduct, Ohio University
must take necessary steps to block further banter.
Patrick Washburn and Eddith Dashiell have been exchanging barbs since
Washburn was denied an interview to become the director of the E.W. Scripps
School of Journalism. Dashiell, who sat on the committee to identify a
director, said she became the victim of Washburn’s harassment following
the 1997 search. Washburn countered by distributing his unfavorable peer
evaluation through Scripps Hall in 1998. He then filed a complaint against
Dashiell for writing negative comments in his evaluations.
The escalating back-and-forth personal hostility in the school continued
for five years, during which time the public jabs at each other damaged
the school’s morale and reputation. The infighting took professors away
from their duties and wasted school resources.
This behavior must stop. Now. While Washburn said he will not change
his behavior based on the findings, he must let the issue die. The bickering
already has brought enough casualties: an Ohio Civil Rights Commission
inquiry accusing OU of “reverse racism,” a special investigation and hours
wasted on interviews and depositions.
Dashiell must be aware that her position in the Dean’s Office adds another
layer to the already dense situation. A civil tone must be returned to
Scripps Hall, and that requires both parties to admit past bad behavior
and work toward a more professional environment.
OU officials, however, should be commended for handing the issue to special
counsel James Sillery. By bringing in a third-party to investigate the
allegations and to recommend how to repair the rifts in the journalism
school, the university took appropriate steps to rectify an already tense
situation. But OU officials must take further steps to ensure all members
of the faculty are aware of proper workplace behavior so incidents like
this are not allowed to repeat themselves.
Washburn must take whatever the College of Communication
hands down as a reprimand and cut his losses. The third-party counsel
issued his ruling. The college should not issue a punishment that exceeds
the crime. Both parties, talented and noted academics, must move beyond
the egos and enter the classroom and return to what should be their primary
responsibility — students.
|